How to Compare Before/After EQ with Transfer Function
TL;DR
Before/after comparison is how you prove your EQ adjustments worked. SonaVyx's trace store and overlay feature lets you capture a baseline, apply your EQ changes, remeasure, and see the improvement in a single plot. The difference curve shows exactly how many dB you improved at each frequency.
Step-by-Step Procedure
- Capture the baseline measurement. Open Transfer Function mode. Play pink noise through the system at operating level. Allow 8-10 averages for a stable reading. When the magnitude trace and coherence are stable, press S to store the trace. Name it "Before EQ."
- Note the key problems. Identify peaks, dips, and regions of poor coherence. Use the crosshair cursor to read exact frequencies and dB values. Common issues: +8 dB peak at 2.5 kHz (harshness), -12 dB dip at 160 Hz (thin bass), rising response above 4 kHz (excessive brightness).
- Apply your EQ adjustments. Work on the system processor or mixing console. Start with the largest deviations first. Use the AI diagnostic recommendations if available — SonaVyx suggests specific frequency, gain, and Q values. Cut peaks rather than boosting dips (cutting is more phase-friendly and reduces gain before feedback).
- Remeasure. Without moving the microphone or changing levels, start a new measurement. The live trace now shows the post-EQ response. SonaVyx overlays this against your stored "Before EQ" trace in real time.
- Store the after trace. Press S to store the post-EQ measurement. Name it "After EQ." You now have both traces visible: before (stored color) and after (live or second stored trace).
- Analyze the difference. The overlay shows improvement at each frequency. A flatter response with tighter deviation from your target curve means success. Check that you did not create new problems — sometimes fixing one peak reveals a previously masked issue.
- Export the comparison. Export both traces as FRD files for your report. SonaVyx's report generator can include the before/after overlay plot with improvement metrics: overall deviation reduction, peak reduction, and flatness improvement percentage.
Tips for Effective Comparison
- Do not move the microphone. Even 10 cm of movement changes the high-frequency response due to comb filtering from reflections. Mark the mic position or use a stand.
- Keep the source level constant. If you change the pink noise level between before and after, the comparison is invalid. Use the same output level for both measurements.
- Use the same FFT size and averaging. Changing analysis parameters between measurements creates apparent differences that are not real.
- Target curves are your friend. Enable a target curve (Flat, X-Curve, or House Curve) to see how both measurements compare to your goal, not just to each other.
Common Mistakes
- Only looking at magnitude. Check phase too. Aggressive EQ (high Q, large boost) introduces phase distortion. If the phase plot shows new wraps after EQ, consider using gentler corrections.
- Chasing perfection. A ±3 dB window around your target is excellent. Trying to flatten every 1 dB bump leads to over-EQ'd, unnatural sound.
- Ignoring coherence. If coherence drops in the after measurement, something changed (mic moved, noise increased). The magnitude difference at low-coherence frequencies is not meaningful.
Tool Bridge
Open SonaVyx Transfer Function mode, store your baseline, apply EQ, and overlay the result. Use the Report Generator for a professional before/after comparison report.
Standard Reference
AES-2id:
Try It Now
Open this measurement tool in your browser — free, no download required.
Last updated: March 19, 2026